La naturaleza y el grado de interacción de las ONG con las Naciones Unidas en el marco del ECOSOC

Authors

Abstract

El principal vehículo en la dinámica ONU-ONG es el programa de estatus consultivo del Consejo Económico y Social de las Naciones Unidas (ECOSOC). La literatura existente aborda la ONU en relación con la facilitación de la colaboración formal con la sociedad civil internacional, pero se han realizado pocas investigaciones para examinar los patrones a gran escala de las ONG en dichas colaboraciones. Este estudio buscó abordar parcialmente esta última deficiencia en la literatura mediante el análisis de la naturaleza y el grado de participación de las ONG en el programa de estatus consultivo del ECOSOC de las Naciones Unidas. Los resultados de una encuesta realizada a una muestra aleatoria del 10% de las ONG con estatus consultivo revelaron que la mayoría de las organizaciones tienen una participación mínima y una gran minoría de las ONG con estatus consultivo no parecen participar activamente.

Keywords:

Organizaciones de la sociedad civil, ECOSOC, OIG, Organizaciones intergubernamentales, ONG, Naciones Unidas

Author Biography

Barry Mowell, American Military University

Associate Professor of International Relations/Studies, Department of Global and Security Studies, American Military University.

References

Algar, C. (2002). The Emerging Roles of NGOs in the UN System: From Article 71 to a People’s Millennium Assembly. Global Governance. 8(1), 93-117. DOI:10.2307/27800329

Barnett, M. and & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Cornell University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctt7z7mx

Bloem, R., Attia, I. & Dam, P. (2008). The Conference of NGOs (CONGO): The Story of Strengthening Civil Society Engagement with the United Nations. In Walker, J. & Thompson, A. (Eds.) Critical Mass: The Emergence of Global Civil Society. Wilfrid Laurier University Press. https://lccn.loc.gov/2010275704

Bolton, M. & Nash, T. (2010). The Role of Middle Power–NGO Coalitions in Global Policy: The Case of the Cluster Munitions Ban. Global Policy. 1(2), 172-84. DOI:10.1111/j.1758-5899.2009.00015.x

Carpenter, R. (2010). Governing the Global Agenda: “Gatekeepers” and ‘Issue Adoption’ in Transnational Advocacy Networks. In Avant, D., Finnemore, M. & Sell, S. (Eds.) Who Governs the Globe? Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845369

Cassese, A. (1979). How Could Nongovernmental Organizations Use UN Bodies More Effectively? Universal Human Rights. 1(4), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.2307/761786

Clark, A., Friedman, E., & Hochstetler, K. (1998). The Sovereign Limits of Global Civil Society: A Comparison of NGO Participation in UN World Conferences on the Environment, Human Rights and Women. World Politics. 51(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007772

Deitelhoff, N. (2009). The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case. International Organization. 63(1), 33-65. doi:10.1017/S002081830909002X

Fox, J. & Brown, L. (1998). The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs and Grassroots Movements. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262561174/the-struggle-for-accountability/

Global Humanitarian Assistance. (2014). In Focus: NGO Fundraising Coalitions and Typhoon Haiyan. GHA Report 2014. http://www.globalhumanitarianassistance.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/GHA-2014-In-focus-NGO-fundraising-coalitions-and-Typhoon-Haiyan.pdf

Jokic, A. (2013). Go Local: Morality and International Activism. Ethics and Global Politics 6(1), 39-62. https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v6i1.20017

Kahn, S. (2010). Limits to Transnational Participation: The Global Governance of Migration. In Jonsson, C. & Jonas Tallberg, J. (Eds.) Transnational Actors in Global Governance. Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230283220_7

Kryst, M. (2012). Coalitions of Labor Unions and NGOs: The Room for Ma­neuver of the German Clean Clothes Campaign. Interface. 4(2), 101-29. https://www.interfacejournal.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Interfa­ce-4-2-Kryst.pdf

Kwesiga, J. & Namisi, H. (2006). Issues in Legislation for NGOs in Uganda. In Jordan, L. & Tuijl, P. (Eds.) NGO Accountability: Politics, Principles and Innovations. Earthscan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849772099

Kymlicka, W. (2008). Multicultural Odys­seys: Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity. Oxford Universi­ty Press: 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199280407.001.0001

Linz, J. & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consoli­dation: Southern Europe, South Ameri­ca, and Post-communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801851575

Mowell, B. (2017). Pluralism and Propor­tionality in the Representation of Euro­pean International Civil Society within the UN Framework: A Sub-regional Comparison. European Politics and So­ciety. 19(2), 230-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2017.1419597

Mowell, B. (2018a). United Nations-NGO Accreditation Regimes: A Comparative Profile. Journal of International Orga­nizations Studies. 9(2), 143-149. https://journal-iostudies.org/sites/default/fi­les/2020-01/9JIOSfall18.pdf

Mowell, B. (2018b). Patterns of Develop­ment Issues and Proportional Represen­tation in UN-Affiliated NGOs Related to the Millennium Development Goals and the Monterrey Consensus. Journal of Global South Studies. 35(2), 359-389. https://doi.org/10.1353/gss.2018.0031

Mowell, B. (2020). NGO Goal-Setting/At­tainment and Perceptions of Benefits Derived within the Framework of the UN-ECOSC Consultative Status Pro­gram. Open Political Science. 3(1), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2020-0009

Mowell, B. (2021). Barriers to UN-Civil So­ciety Collaborations: An Exploratory Study of CSOs within the UN-ECO­SOC Consultative Status Program­me. International Studies 58(4), 466-490. DOI: 10.1177/00208817211056751

Mowell, B. (2023). Macro-Regional Pat­terns of CSO Affiliation/Participa­tion within the UN-Civil Sciety Fra­mework: The Underrepresentation of the Developing World. Estudos In­ternacionais. 11(1), 65-85. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2023v11n1p65-85

Mowell, B. (2025). Civil Society Input and Participation Within the IGO-Civil So­ciety Dynamic: A Case Study of United Nations-CSO Accreditation Regimes. In Cockerham, J. (Ed.) Political Parti­cipation: Citizen Input in Government. Vernon Press.

O’Brien, R., Goetz, A. Scholte, J. and Williams, M. (2000). Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491603

Paul, J. (2000). NGOs and Global Policy-Making. Global Policy Forum. https://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/31611-ngos-and-global-policy-making.html

Putnam, R. (2001). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

Raustiala, K. (1997). States, NGOs and International Environmental Institutions. International Studies Quarterly 41(4), 719-740. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.00064

Riddell-Dixon, E. (2008). Facilitating NGO Participation: An Assessment of Canadian Government-Sponsored Mechanisms for the Copenhagen Summit for Social Development and the Beijing Conference on Women. In Walker, J. & Thompson, A. (Eds.) Critical Mass: The Emergence of Global Civil Society. The Centre for International Governance Innovation; Wilfrid Laurier University Press. https://www.wlupress.wlu.ca/Books/C/Critical-Mass

Tallberg, J. (2010). Transnational Access to International Institutions: Three Approaches. In Jonsson, C. & Tallberg, J. (Eds.) Transnational Actors in Global Governance. Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230283220_7

Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T. & Jonsson, C.. (2013). The Opening Up of International Organizations: Transnational Access in Global Governance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107325135

Thiel, M. (2017). European Civil Society and Human Rights Advocacy. Penn State University Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812294224

Udall, L. (1998). The World Bank and Public Accountability: Has Anything Changed? In Fox, J. & Brown, L. (Eds.) The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs and Grassroots Movements. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139159909604635

Uhlin, A. (2009). Which Characteristics of Civil Society Organizations Support What Aspects of Democracy? Evidence from Post-communist Latvia. International Political Science Review. 30(3), 271-95. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25652907

Union of International Associations. (2024). Yearbook of International Organizations. http://www.uia.org/yearbook

USAID. (2024). Private Voluntary Organizations. https://www.usaid.gov/pvo

United Nations. (1999). The United Nations and Civil Society: Report of the Thirtieth UN Issues Conference. http://www.stanleyfoundation.org/publications/archive/Issues99.pdf

Waisman, C. (2006). Autonomy, Self-regulation, and Democracy: Tocquevillean-Gellnerian Perspectives on Civil Society and the Bifurcated State in Latin America. In Feinberg, R., Waisman, C., & Zamosc, L. (Eds.) Civil Society and Democracy in Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983244

World Health Organization. (2012). Buil­ding Advocacy Coalitions for Greater Action and Accountability. http://www. who.int/pmnch/media/news/2012/advo­cacy_building_coalitions.pdf

Willetts, P. (Ed.) (1996). The Conscience of the World: The Influence of Non-govern­mental Organizations in the UN System. Brookings Institution. https://www.js­tor.org/stable/10.7864/jj.17497002